Up against the face of time,
pressing to look a little beyond.
Though the seat holds me down,
I look with earnestness to know past what I view.
A seed pushed deep into the ground,
the sprouting of which and a reach.
Peeking out the top of the soil,
a start it is that's all.
Tuesday, December 28, 2010
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Space is a medium. Distance is a measurement. Proximity is a map. What is change?
Finally, there is a way. I'd like to suggest that when a thing is lost, in other words, when the proximity of things is changed and there is limited knowledge as to the location of a thing, that finding that thing is directly related to the time spent looking through space. If one's life is confined to a space 3 meters squared and there is no possibility of the thing which is lost leaving that confinement, then the amount of time spent looking for a thing will be related to the amount of things which must be observed or moved until the whole space or sufficient space has been observed to find that thing.
Imagine an idea is placed within a human mind that a thing has been lost. Then a desire is formed to find it. How will it be found? If the mind is as a confinement, then there is an answer. If a mind has the ability to create ideas which do not derive from actual movement of things as they were observed or experienced then confinement may not be an appropriate way to describe the problem. Finally, what if it does not exists in a form that can be found? Or can not be understood at present even if recalled, thus found.
Again, man as an organism has two primary forces that circulate energy. Energy circulation is what sustains life. Energy is stored within matter or transferred by other means. Once the energy has been absorbed, the matter is rejected. That form of energy absorption is characterized by the pull factor. It is where an organism attempts to fulfill a lack of energy by pulling a source of energy to a location that can change the proximity with the organism as to enable the organism to circulate its energy, thus maintaining existence.
For organisms that do not possess the ability to change their location, pull is essential to the circulation of energy. Perhaps organisms which survive are those which adapt to develop their ability to attract and maintain sources of energy until those source have been extinguished.
If the energy source is sustainable, the organism will bond to the source and the distance will be maintained. If the energy source does not have the ability to change its proximity to the organism, the bond will be maintained for the life of the organism or energy source, or until the organism is approached by a new source of energy that, in comparison to its current source, is offering a benefit that the organism can recognize and establish willingness to change proximity.
For an organism that has the ability to change its location, the number of attainable sources of energy will increase if the organism has the ability to determine the location of energy sources and finds them. The organism is a source of energy and may be pulled by other organisms which may through the change of proximity extinguish the first, unless the first has the ability to sustain or provide more energy than is absorbed by the second.
The movement of things is central to physical existence, being comprised of exchange. Depending upon the ability of one organism to reject energy being drawn, exchanges will vary. What is termed 'win, win' merely shows how two organisms find exchange of energy mutually beneficial; where the proximity enables a harmony of energy exchange.
When an organism believes that it has obtained a proximity that provides substantial benefit it will be less likely to change locations and will maintain proximity.
If the energy source comes in the form of matter, and proximity is directly related to size of space, matter whose energy has been absorbed will be pushed away. Whereas pulling directly affects the proximity of the organism to energy, and therefore changes the proximity of other organisms as well, pushing, likewise changes the proximity of non-energy carrying matter with regards to other organisms.
Pushing can be used as a strategy to interact with intelligent organisms, where a certain package or proximity of benefit can be achieved through exchange. When viewing proximity at its most basic forms, only maintenance of life is reflected. Moving to a larger view, though life is still the main focus, yet a more complex structure gives rise to consider new reasoning.
Needs are proximity patterns which appear to sustain the appearance of the maintenance of life and may actually do that by actually sustaining the life through circulation of patterns at a given rate, or by the idea of it.
What if a person forgets the pattern of proximity that equals maintenance of life? If it does not die, then it will either find life by adapting to a new proximity or it will decide that its formerly maintained beliefs of life-maintaining proximity were not correct, or both. If the idea is forgotten (and is not found) and life continues, then what of the thought?
Perhaps establishing limits to where thoughts linger will both maintain a general proximity that maintains mental life and mental health. Meaning a limitation of breadth. Since a limit of breadth would cause an immediate cause for depth to increase, than to cap that will lead to clarity. Clarity being weighed against breadth or depth, that's an interesting proposition. How useful is clarity, unless something is to be seen in more detail. And would not more detail connote a depth or breadth increase.
No, the mind cannot stop from expanding. Therefore it can either be channeled or left to wander. A thing lost in the mind, a thought for example, could be anywhere. It cannot be found by measuring the space and turning the number of limited objects that reside in that space. And what if what's lost is an idea of a thing that does not exist, or is the idea that something non-existent needs to be found?
The proximity of thoughts could be a reflection of the proximity of things.
Imagine an idea is placed within a human mind that a thing has been lost. Then a desire is formed to find it. How will it be found? If the mind is as a confinement, then there is an answer. If a mind has the ability to create ideas which do not derive from actual movement of things as they were observed or experienced then confinement may not be an appropriate way to describe the problem. Finally, what if it does not exists in a form that can be found? Or can not be understood at present even if recalled, thus found.
Again, man as an organism has two primary forces that circulate energy. Energy circulation is what sustains life. Energy is stored within matter or transferred by other means. Once the energy has been absorbed, the matter is rejected. That form of energy absorption is characterized by the pull factor. It is where an organism attempts to fulfill a lack of energy by pulling a source of energy to a location that can change the proximity with the organism as to enable the organism to circulate its energy, thus maintaining existence.
For organisms that do not possess the ability to change their location, pull is essential to the circulation of energy. Perhaps organisms which survive are those which adapt to develop their ability to attract and maintain sources of energy until those source have been extinguished.
If the energy source is sustainable, the organism will bond to the source and the distance will be maintained. If the energy source does not have the ability to change its proximity to the organism, the bond will be maintained for the life of the organism or energy source, or until the organism is approached by a new source of energy that, in comparison to its current source, is offering a benefit that the organism can recognize and establish willingness to change proximity.
For an organism that has the ability to change its location, the number of attainable sources of energy will increase if the organism has the ability to determine the location of energy sources and finds them. The organism is a source of energy and may be pulled by other organisms which may through the change of proximity extinguish the first, unless the first has the ability to sustain or provide more energy than is absorbed by the second.
The movement of things is central to physical existence, being comprised of exchange. Depending upon the ability of one organism to reject energy being drawn, exchanges will vary. What is termed 'win, win' merely shows how two organisms find exchange of energy mutually beneficial; where the proximity enables a harmony of energy exchange.
When an organism believes that it has obtained a proximity that provides substantial benefit it will be less likely to change locations and will maintain proximity.
If the energy source comes in the form of matter, and proximity is directly related to size of space, matter whose energy has been absorbed will be pushed away. Whereas pulling directly affects the proximity of the organism to energy, and therefore changes the proximity of other organisms as well, pushing, likewise changes the proximity of non-energy carrying matter with regards to other organisms.
Pushing can be used as a strategy to interact with intelligent organisms, where a certain package or proximity of benefit can be achieved through exchange. When viewing proximity at its most basic forms, only maintenance of life is reflected. Moving to a larger view, though life is still the main focus, yet a more complex structure gives rise to consider new reasoning.
Needs are proximity patterns which appear to sustain the appearance of the maintenance of life and may actually do that by actually sustaining the life through circulation of patterns at a given rate, or by the idea of it.
What if a person forgets the pattern of proximity that equals maintenance of life? If it does not die, then it will either find life by adapting to a new proximity or it will decide that its formerly maintained beliefs of life-maintaining proximity were not correct, or both. If the idea is forgotten (and is not found) and life continues, then what of the thought?
Perhaps establishing limits to where thoughts linger will both maintain a general proximity that maintains mental life and mental health. Meaning a limitation of breadth. Since a limit of breadth would cause an immediate cause for depth to increase, than to cap that will lead to clarity. Clarity being weighed against breadth or depth, that's an interesting proposition. How useful is clarity, unless something is to be seen in more detail. And would not more detail connote a depth or breadth increase.
No, the mind cannot stop from expanding. Therefore it can either be channeled or left to wander. A thing lost in the mind, a thought for example, could be anywhere. It cannot be found by measuring the space and turning the number of limited objects that reside in that space. And what if what's lost is an idea of a thing that does not exist, or is the idea that something non-existent needs to be found?
The proximity of thoughts could be a reflection of the proximity of things.
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)